It was possible to determine the title as "Let us not blame every critic for accusations of ignorance and betrayal. Because perhaps in a state of power for many years, the rulers and their allies have come to a point where they are unbearable. It can be said that criticism usually does not like people. Even if such an approach is correct, the intolerance of criticism of power owners raises serious problems. In a society, it is primarily against the nature of human beings that every sector thinks the same things in every subject and it is unquestionable to ask for the unquestionable applause of every power. I do not stop at all about the democracy dimension of the work, I just want to remind you that democracy is a multitude.
I think that the American McKinsey company consulting services will be received by Treasury and Finance Minister Berat Albayrak after the announcement of the intense criticism came to the agenda. A terrorist attack against our country over the dollar launched a US deal in the economic consultancy services to be signed in the agreement was pointed out wrong. I am one of the participants in the criticisms in question. My approach may be wrong, according to the members of the government. However, this approach was more wrong than the agreement signed with the US company. Because such an approach meant to declare all critics a traitor. However, patriotism in a country, even in power, is not in the name of anyone. Moreover, criticism of what the government is doing is absolutely not to be regarded as treacherous. Such an approach does not benefit anyone. In this respect, the power owners can make the criticism of the criticism rather than suppress the criticisms with the qualifications such as in ignorance and betrayal. Because the criticism of ignorance and treachery as a means of criticism in the sense of criticism in the face of those who say a simple devotion to the road means.
Another point I would like to draw attention to is the fact that the members of the government, who are frequently accusing the opposition with treason during their criticism, will lead to a serious campaigning in the society. It is possible to accept these accusations. Because the task of the opposition is not only to criticize, but also to express what they know right. However, this is true to the language of each language in the language of the accusations of treason, the members of the power, anet We do not need your mind. The most patriot is us, we know everything. It would be very wrong to come to such a point without knowing or knowing. This means there is no more room for dialogue between segments of society. This is dominated by the deaf dialogue in the country.
At the point, President Erdoğan stated that they had canceled the agreement and stated that we can suffice and that the criticisms against the agreement in question are justified. This is because the main idea of opposing the agreement signed with the US consultancy company. So we can afford it. As such, President Erdoğan should not apologize for the accusations of ignorance and betrayal, for the owners of the criticisms against the agreement until he makes this statement. Obviously, the President of the Republic of Turkey agreed that the agreement is wrong. The accusations against the owners of the criticisms made until then came to this point have been left in vain and their owners have been unfair. As such, should not the habit of denying any criticism of the government's actions to be accused of ignorance and betrayal at least? If the debates will give such a result, a wrong result would have been wrong. When someone turns out to be the best of all things I know, they become embarrassed.