The powerful, in other words, in a world where, what the colonists say is accepted, the peace of humanity is not possible, nor will it be possible. In addition, when the greedy ambitions of the colonialists are added to this, it means that if nothing can be done more than to settle for what is given to most of the world, then this order will continue. Another dimension of the business is that it will not come charity from this corrupt system, no one on earth knows that this order must be changed. However, the exploited do not move to change this order, they cannot act. Those who act are being removed from the government by global bandits. The strange part of this is that those who act on occasion to change this order, and those who are campaigning about this issue, are forced to consent to the continuation of the present state after a while. Then there are two things left; the first is to stand up and willing to paying the price to end this exploitation, if this cannot be done, it is necessary to learn to enjoy the current situation.
Usually, in many countries the colonialists can find themselves supporters and tongs in favor of them. They carry on exploited by rubbing the back of their supporters and throwing a share in front of them as they exploit a little. As a result, while the exploiters and their tongs live comfortably on Earth, while the large masses suffer both from seeing the truth and from the fact that something is not coming from their hands.
In the meantime, another issue is the state of the rulers who offer cooperation with the colonialists to their societies as a remedy for the liberation and well-being of the countries. For example, our relations with the United States have generally been on the same line since the beginning. For example, we sent troops to Korea because the US wanted it. As a reward (!) we became NATO members. However, we have to think and question what we have gained from this membership. It was suggested that the reason for our entry into NATO would protect us from the spread of communism. There is nothing to protect. It can only be said to be a deterrent force. But the time has passed, the Soviet Union has disintegrated, communism has gone bankrupt, NATO is still maintaining its existence and our membership is continuing. Well, who is NATO protecting now is against whom? In other words, why does NATO, which was established as an alternative to the Warsaw Pact, continue to exist since the Warsaw Pact has been dissolved?
It is possible to sort more questions. However, now that the only determining force in NATO is the US and it is stripped of banditry in this country, then it is clear that walking with the United States directly or through NATO is no more than harm.
When we look at the issue from the point of view of Turkey-US relations, it is disturbing. Because since Turkey is a country that opposes all kinds of exploitation and explains it on every platform, there is no point in walking side by side with the United States which sees it as a right to change administration through coups in countries. Beyond this, the Ikhwan movement, the coup leader Sisi wants, which calls the terrorist organization the United States how will be given a photograph together. This is not enough, in North of the Syria trying to create an area parallel to the border with Turkey trying to create a space for terrorists to use in their control, let us leave with a US who declares this as a military garrison, and even friendship cannot harm us? Doesn't it?
Is it possible for humanity to be in peace and security in a world that does not even decide who should manage it? The remedy is the fair order which is dominated in the world.