Abdulkadir Özkan: "Is Russia a terrorist or an invader state?"

Abdulkadir Özkan: "Is Russia a terrorist or an invader state?"
Date: 21.10.2022 10:00

Milli Gazete columnist Abdulkadir Özkan writes on Russia. Here is the full article.

email Print zoom+ zoom-
Ursula von der Leyen, Head of the European Commission, said in a statement that "What Russia is doing is terrorism." Whether this assessment is right or wrong does not alleviate the damage caused by Russia's attacks on Ukraine. Moreover, in my opinion, Russia continues its occupations in Ukraine and added the occupied areas to Russia; Staring at the world, it declares that it has made it a part of Russia.
 
Well, Russia declares that it is continuing its occupation movement in Ukraine, but what kind of reaction is coming from the world? For example, are EU countries taking a step to stop this invasion? Moreover, how does the USA behave? In other words, is there any movement in today's world other than condemnation statements to prevent Russia's invasion action? Let me point out right away that no action is taking place. Russia's occupation movement is just being watched.
 
Meanwhile, some states declare Russia as a terrorist, but the same states do not give this reaction to Israel's attacks and massacres against the Palestinians. It is as if they are encouraging Israel with their silence:
 
Let me just say that I do not expect a serious reaction against Israel from the USA, the EU and NATO as an international organization. Because I know that waiting would be deceiving myself. My interest in what's going on in the world for years has brought me to this point.
 
At this point, since what Russia is doing is terrorism, what is the EU doing in the face of this terrorism? How does he behave? They do not take any serious steps to prevent terrorism. Moreover, it is not possible to look at the events in a different way, especially when it is obvious that terrorists and terrorists in our region are supported by countries such as the USA, EU and Russia.
 
For example, some EU countries do not refer to the PKK/YPG as a terrorist organization, while declaring DAESH, which they have created and put on the ground with their own hands, and to which they have given all kinds of support and continue to give, as a terrorist organization.
 
Maybe they think that calling these organizations terrorists will cause them to lose their credibility. Because while explaining the support they give to terrorist organizations in our region, they declare their unity in the fight against DEASH terrorist organization. In short, they use DAESH to hide their cooperation with terrorism.
 
At this point, the fact that the name of the PKK/YPG is not mentioned in the indictment prepared about the company, which has been on the agenda recently, while DAESH is mentioned as a terrorist organization in the indictment prepared against the company on the occasion of cooperation with terrorist organizations, does not this mean that the PKK/YPG is acquitted?
 
In short, it is no longer a secret that the terrorist organizations of the Islamic world are a product of the Crusader/Zionist alliance and that they use these organizations as pawns in their occupation of our region. It consists only of foreign-dependent administrations ignoring the terrorist cooperation in question.
 
As Turkey, we have an obligation to accurately evaluate the events around us. Because we need to see the pointlessness of trying to be together with those who still describe the invasion of Russia as terrorism and ignore the invasion, and create a new foreign policy.
 
Moreover, those who see it as their right to cooperate with terrorists as long as a new center of power, namely the Islamic alliance, is not established against the Crusader-Zionist alliance, will be content with saying that it is terrorism instead of evaluating an invader from this aspect.
 
At a time when such murders and even occupations are increasing, mediating between an occupier and the occupied country in ensuring the export of wheat does not mean being a world leader. At most, it would be to use it as a material in domestic politics. Moreover, we would continue to deceive ourselves with the claims that the UN was established to prevent wars in the world. Because the UN does not have the ability to intervene in wars, because this organization was established to create an international cover for the occupation and murders of 5 colonial countries on the earth.
 
As a result, we can say; The Islamic Union, which the late Erbakan has been trying to explain for 50 years, must be established as soon as possible in order for Islamic justice to prevail in the world and for injustices to come to an end.

YEREL HABERLER

Milli Gazete Puplication Group All Rights Reserved © 2000-2016 - Can not be published without permission ! Tel : +90 212 697 1000  /  Fax : +90 212 697 1000 Software Development and System Support: Milli Gazete