Before giving a clear answer to this question, it is necessary to determine what the alliances of the new era are or should be. For example, if the alliance is made with the ruling party, does this mean a coalition? Or, can we describe the alliance with the ruling party as an external support to the minority government, though not common in the past? These questions are difficult to answer because of the conditions of the day. Because there is neither a de facto coalition nor the support of the minority government from outside. Because there is no minority power. At that time, it is possible to describe the alliance of the ruling party with the MHP as a supporter. As such, there is an unspecified external support.
In fact, AKP-MHP alliance is not very important how to qualify the association. There is a union or road friendship. What I want to focus on is not exactly what the MHP-AKP alliance revealed that the image ultimately leads to an uncertainty. For example, CHP General Minister Kılıçdaroğlu, in one of his speeches, stressed the uncertainty about this issue by saying: ”If the opposition parties criticize one another, the biggest advantage is the ruling party. MHP Chairman Bahceli, taking part in the party of the ruling party, and, moreover, in the same line of opposition against the opposition parties, the MHP opposition party or the ruling party as the ruling party brings to mind the question. Of course, the position of the MHP will be determined by itself. However, the opposition to other opposition parties in the same line and with the same hardness, and in particular the power of dissenting opposition, such as power, has inevitably brought up a new approach in politics. This approach results in the fact that the parties, who are not themselves, have left the parties outside of them as those who are not traitors or homeland lovers.
The MHP's pro-government approach, which is more than opposition and power, leads to uncertainty. More precisely, the uncertainty in the functioning of politics, but the uncertainty in determining the position of the MHP is in question. Thus, Kılıçdaroğlu's opposition to the MHP's approach to the fact that the power to stay in the air is staying. The MHP is apparently the opposition party, but in fact it supports the government in almost every way. He uses the same style as the power spokesmen. The MHP and the AKP seems to be an alliance of two different parties, but in fact there is an unnamed association. Another question that comes to mind is that if the two parties can exhibit such a union in almost every issue, then the AKP or MHP approached the AKP in the last time? It is not possible to give a clear answer to this question. Because sometimes both sides appear at very different points. However, these differences give an exceptional look. Since there is usually no difference between the two parties, shouldn't they put the name of this union in a clear way and prevent them from interfering with the recipes of power and opposition?
Let me point out that the opposition parties do not criticize each other. Of course, all parties have to express each other's wrong. However, it is the main duty of the opposition to express the mistakes of power because the executive authority is power. In doing so you need to pay attention to the style. When a party declares themselves patriotic, they exhibit such a style as a loss of level of power in the political parties, but they also bring to the agenda such a way that it causes a loss of level in politics. This should not be forgotten.