While the department of ruling party, which is in the position of decision making and implementation, a new fashion emerged in our country. Opposition parties criticizing the ruling decisions are immediately declared a traitor. On the other hand, although many decisions taken by the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) government have harmed our country in practice, the owners of this decision have always been national and the criticizing opposition has been seen as non-national. In this way, it is difficult to benefit from different opinions, to determine the best and the right of a step to be taken or to return from the wrong step taken. Sometimes the new attitude determined to return from the wrong raises another mistake. As a result, power is the owner of the good and right, opposition is the owner of the wrong.
However, from time to time, the holders of power may inadvertently make wrong decisions. And the decisions they think they have taken in the interests of the country may be wrong. However, since the owners of power generally see themselves as infallible, it is not possible to make wrong decisions from the beginning, and to return to this path once they are realized. For example, in the first days of the internal conflicts, the rulers of our country drew such a picture that Assad administration, who is responsible for the events in Syria for a month, will get away from work in a few months and all kinds of anarchy and terror will end in Syria. will be at peace. It was presented like this. But in spite of the years passed, neither the Assad administration nor Syria and the US and Russia have taken action to remove Assad. In fact, Russia directly supported the Syrian regime, while the US indirectly supported the Assad regime. We have seen that the human rights violations in Syria do not concern the US and Russia at all. What is important to them is their continued interest in Syria. For this reason, the two countries have directly contacted with terrorist organizations in Syria. By doing this openly, the US gave the terrorist organization the task of protecting oil regions in Syria on its behalf, while Russia did this with the Syrian regime. As a result, at this point, the US and Russia on Syria as they remain loyal to the agreement signed with Turkey, work has become increasingly more inextricable from within. They even ignored the problems posed by the refugee migration to our country. According to the agreement, despite the promises given to Turkey was abandoned to its own devices.
In coming to this point of the event, the losing party in Turkey, the winner of the US and Russia that our country's missteps and their applications at no share of managers do? Is it a reminder of the situation as a betrayal of the country? As long as this understanding continues, can it be possible for the people of this country to express their thoughts easily? On the one hand, it is necessary to put an end to the fact that the country is condemned to unity, while democracy is repeated at every opportunity where it is polyphony.
Yesterday in a newspaper, "the US' SDG is gone, the Russian's SDG is came," with this headline published. Would it be wrong to ask that the US and Russia should not be trusted by the rulers of this country? Finally, I would like to recall the drama caused by Russian-backed regime forces against Idlib. According to reports, the Syrian military attacks with the support of Russia led to a great humanitarian drama in Idlib. For the last 20 days at least 215 thousand civilians were displaced and forced to migrate. Is it possible to hold the opposition responsible for all these situations, not for power?