It’s clear that it’s impossible for the UN organization to make peace and justice dominant on earth under the command of the 5 permanent members of the Security Council, because in the establishment of this organization, it was seen that the purpose wasn’t to make peace and justice dominant on earth, but to protect the profits of these 5 members. The founders determined the structure accordingly. For this reason, the criticism towards this organization is gradually increasing. With these criticisms, the need of establishment an alternative international organization is increasing each passing day. So what? Nothing is happening, just because, despite all criticisms, the creation of an alternative organization can’t be brought to the agenda. When it comes to the agenda, those who brought it are being punished by being suspended from work in various ways, especially with coups.
It isn’t true to wait that peace and justice will dominate on earth in a world where bandit/bandits are the rulers. Bandits just do brigandage. Only their profits are important for them, not the domination of peace and justice on earth because bandits can’t exist in a world dominated by justice. Of course the bandits aren’t just showing up in the world cause the structure of the UN. Besides this, I think before the US, we should get angry with the administrators who yielder to bandits without resisting seriously and to administrators who immediately carry out the requests of the bandits.
Yesterday, in my article, I tried to draw attention to what happened in Venezuela and that the attitude of the USA is a complete banditry. By the way, when we remember the murder of Khashoggi at the Consulate of Saudi Arabia in İstanbul and the happenings after this incident, and the silence of the US to these incidents which actually shows up in nearly every issue, show us another dimension of banditry. When we think about the cooperation of the US and Saudi Arabia administration to cover up the murder in the consulate and when remember wherefore the US exhibited attitudes like these or how much dollars it gets, it seems impossible to find solutions to problems which are spoken for days and then doomed to be forgotten.
As a last example we can show to this banditry is the UN Rapporteur Callamard, who came to Istanbul to investigate the murder of Khashoggi, and couldn’t get in to the Consulate building by the Saudi agents. I think it will not be wrong to qualify the silence of the US which occupies countries on accounts of the fact of democracy and human rights in such a situation, and their partisans as banditry. The UN Rapporteur came to Istanbul to investigate a murder, and he would submit his research to the UN as a report. Don’t the silence of the five permanent members of the Security Council and particularly the silence of the US mean that they don’t want to clarify this murder? Especially since the murder, is it wrong to say that they had been served to take this murder off the agenda?
Isn’t the existence of such an UN more detrimental than its absence if the doors aren’t open for an UN official who came to İstanbul for the investigation of the murder and if the permanent members don’t take the action against such an attitude? There is a murder and it’s clear that there are a number of Saudi administrations behind this murder… Unfortunately, even an investigation can’t be done. This failure is under the responsibilities of the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council. Apparently, there are billions to get from Saudi Arabia in order to not to enlighten the murder in question. In a way, the bandits continue to take bribe in order to not to enlighten a murder. As such, not justice but the bandits will continue to dominate on earth.