Venezuela suddenly confused mess. The streets are witnessing the protests of Maduro and Guaido supporters. These could be thought as the internal matter of Venezuela. Under these circumstances, dogmatizing from the outside may not reflect the truth. Nevertheless, I think, it will be beneficial to determine our side by looking to who is supporting Maduro, and who is supporting the Guaido, the leader of the opposition. When we look at the statements of the US, the UK, France, Spain, Australia and Israel that they support the opponent leader before the events became clear, it seems that there is a sharing of wealth. It seems that the essence of the matter doesn’t happen by a democratic way, namely, it is extraneousness with the protecting of the democratic rights of Venezuelan people.
We want to remark that it isn’t important for colonists how people on duty came to that competent authority, it is important for them in what extent they are useful. At this point, I would like to briefly speak of some news in the newspapers. Even these news will show us that we should be careful when choosing our side. In a newspaper on Saturday, January 26, the incident was given as follow:
“Venezuela doesn’t settle down. The eyes of West are on Venezuela’s gold and oil. The US and European countries, which acknowledge their puppets as temporary head of state in Venezuela, seize Caracas’s oil and gold.”
In the detail of the news, the info that the opponent leader had firstly contacted with the US, received a number of promises, and even he wanted an impact fund, and that the United States sent the message that 20 million dollars are ready according to this request took place. I'm not going down in the detail. I think these short quotations are enough to show the truth.
And in a newspaper, when I transmit a short quotation of news under the heading, “This is Rapine,” it will be understood better:
“It is claimed that the Bank of England, with a scandal decision, refused the transfer of gold of Venezuela that is worth 1.2 billion dollar. Pompeo, Secretary of State, repeat his support towards Juan Guaido, who calls the Venezuelan people and army to streets. He dropped the hint, ‘support too and we will make an aid of 20 million dollar’ to Venezuelan people.”
I want to conclude my quotations with one last news:
It is briefly said in the news under the heading of “Trump is preparing for an invasion”:
“The US, which couldn’t break public and military support behind Venezuelan President Maduro, took the military invasion plan into its agenda. Republican Senator Graham has claimed that the US President Trump has come up with the idea to use armament in Venezuela. In the face of these developments, Maduro command ‘get ready’ to the Venezuelan army.”
It is worth to emphasize after these news that Israel is one of the first who recognize the opponent leader whose target is to overthrow Maduro, who utter at every opportunity that he takes sides with Palestinian people. In short, it is clear that the Crusade-Zionist alliance takes sides against Maduro. At such a point, I personally disapprove to develop an opponent attitude by reminding Maduro’s weight or where he ate when he came to Turkey. How accurate can it be to support an opponent leader chosen by the parliament, and developing an attitude towards Maduro who is chosen by the public… If a person elected by the people can be reduced when the distribution of the chairs in the Parliament changes, then what is the meaning of the referendum? My problem is not to defend Maduro. However, it is important to support Maduro against the opponent leader’s US support and according to his side by the Palestinian people that he utters confessedly.