In Adıyaman Municipality, which has a central population of around 400 thousand, spending a total of 117 million Turkish Liras (TL) as a 2-year rental cost of 131 vehicles made one give up. Renting for almost the same price for the vehicles that would become the property of the municipality, if the purchase was made, brought along question marks.
Despite President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's rhetoric about the war against corruption, the events make people say, "This will not happen". Adıyaman Municipality, which has a central population of around 400 thousand, made a bid of 117 million TL for 131 vehicles as a 2-year rental price, which made us give up! While it is stated that almost all of the vehicles can be purchased with a rental price of 117 million TL, it is wondered why the municipality administration resorted to leasing at a time when President Erdoğan waged a war against waste and corruption.
THE TYPE THAT WILL LEAVE ERDOĞAN'S WORDS IN THE AIR!
While entering the election process, President Erdoğan warns AKP municipalities against corruption and waste at every opportunity. Despite President Erdogan's warnings, it is said that the realization of mind-blowing tenders in some municipalities with AKP makes people say ‘it is not possible this much’. What happened in Adıyaman Municipality, which has a central population of 400 thousand and a total population of around 650 thousand, will leave President Erdogan's words that fight waste and corruption in the air!
BIG TENDER IN A SMALL CITY!
The fact that Adıyaman Municipality held a tender for 131 vehicles worth 117 million and 508 thousand 105 TL, including Value Added Tax (VAT), as a 2-year rental price, brought with it question marks. While it is noteworthy that the rental tender is as high as the vehicle purchase figures, it is wondered why the municipality prefers to rent instead of purchasing. While it is foreseen to pay 597 thousand TL as the 2-year rental fee of only one passenger vehicle, it seems possible that the same vehicle will be owned by the municipality for the same fee. The municipality's application to lease instead of purchasing caused also question marks about the company that won the tender.