We need to take seriously the issue of immigration and immigrants, which has become one of our important agenda items recently.
For this, first of all, it is necessary to determine the frame of the subject correctly.
In this context, the first question we should ask is; “Why do people migrate today?”
Of course, migration is a part of the human story and has affected many changes and transformations throughout history.
Everyone knows how much the Migration from Mecca to Medina or the Migration of Tribes had an impact on human history.
People have moved from one place to another on various occasions throughout history. However, the question we are asking today is a current one.
Why did the Afghans or Syrians leave their own countries, immigrate to other countries by disrupting their current life order?
When we look at the dominant discourses on migration/immigrants today, it is seen that this problem is not really taken into the center.
That's why answers or reactions can't hit.
It should be clearly stated that anyone who talks about immigration or immigrants today does not understand the essence of the issue if they do not put Zionism on the dock.
If he is angry with those who come from Syria and Afghanistan, but does not speak out against those who invaded Syria or Afghanistan, then there is a problem in his perspective.
If he thinks that the fires that started in Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan and Iraq, which are intended to spread to Iran and Turkey, are independent of the Great Israel Project, he has been mistaken.
What we mean by current misconception is the mistake of looking at events through the glasses of certain circles, under the influence of the evaluations served through media channels.
It should be clearly stated that the process we live in is the last stages of a plan that has been carried out for many years.
At the first stage, it was tried to design the administrative levels of the countries in the first ten years through the operations and occupations launched in the Islamic world using the Twin Tower Attacks as an excuse on September 11, 2001.
However, the circles that could not achieve the desired result and could not penetrate the conscious sections of the society had to change their plans.
In this context, in the post-2010 period, uprisings targeting the social structure under the name of the Arab Spring were launched in Islamic countries and structures such as Ikhwan were included in this process and forced into error.
Today, Islamic movements in Islamic countries are going through a very difficult process. Each of the Islamic movements, which lost communication with each other, began to fall under the influence of current misconceptions.
However, it should be well known that the target of Zionism is the Great Israel Project with the dream of Promised Lands. In this context, it is almost a credo for them to eliminate all the elements that they see as obstacles and to break the countries of the region into small pieces and make them easy morsels.
While they invaded Afghanistan with these intentions yesterday, they did not even feel the need to hide that Iraq, Syria, Iran and Turkey would be next.
With the famous expression of Condolizza Rice, who explained the goals of the Greater Middle East Project, they announced that they would bring democracy(!) to 22 Islamic countries from Morocco to Indonesia.
Unfortunately, Iraq and Syria were destroyed in the process by the promise of democracy, condemned to an endless spiral of instability and uncertainty. Different sections of the country were hostile to each other.
Although millions of Iraqis, Syrians and Afghans immigrated to other Islamic countries, they still could not establish a healthy communication with Muslims in the countries they went to.
On the other hand, developments such as Muslims' acceptance of the US or Russian alliance preference in Syria, the directing of even Islamic-sensitive sections in Turkey to hostility towards Iran, and the dissemination of the Shiaist discourse centered on Persian nationalism in Iran began to be counted as almost normal developments.
Of course, we do not state all this in order to paint pessimistic pictures or throw the towel in the face of Zionist ambitions. We say that we should evaluate the wave of migration towards Turkey within the scope of Zionism's possible plan based on Iran and Turkey, and determine a strategy accordingly.
In the context of changing the demographic structure in Iran and Turkey, the possibility of directing various groups through Syria and Afghanistan should not be ignored.
It should not be forgotten that Erbakan Hodja, who had warned about Syria years ago, was also talking about the plans of Iran and Turkey to clash with each other in the same statements.
Migration movements can be considered as a preliminary preparation for this conflict environment. This situation proves that we are obliged to be more vigilant than ever and to work for the happiness of our country and humanity.