"From the parliamentary system to the presidential system", "the restructuring" became inevitable.
Now, where some ministries are closed and some ministries are merged, places where government agencies are exposed will be redefined. New rules are being introduced for the remaining bureaucrats.
While some circles are quite "optimistic" about restructuring, some say they are worried about "an indefinite state building process".
According to those who are "optimistic", the state song will return from now on faster and the bureaucracy will no longer be an obstacle!
In this way, the reforms will be much more seriously animated.
The "optimistic" circles are concerned with what is happening, while those who are "pessimistic" are looking at what is happening by showing that the decisions taken are being changed within a day or two.
As an example, they show changes in the regulations regarding the rector election. They reminded that the condition of being a professor in the rector election recently was lifted, but soon after that the rule of being a professor to be rector was brought back.
It is impossible to share the concerns raised by those who are "pessimistic" in this regard.
Of course, such an important issue, such as the rector's choice today is not nice to make such an arrangement the following day.
But we think that such steps should be enlarged too.
We even see the insistence of those who take responsibility for restructuring as a positive step. Is not it a healthy approach to say "we did wrong" instead of insisting on mistakes?
Easy to talk!
The functioning mechanism of a state is being redefined.
Some mistakes can be made during this construction.
For us, it is important to insist on wrongs.
The pro-media should stop exaggerating the work.
Every word that comes out of the mouths of newly appointed ministers should give up offering it as if America is being rediscovered.
When you talk to the sector representatives about a ministerial ministry, what is the real thing about headlines that "It started to work fast"?
The supporters think that it is a matter of ingenuity to be found in comments that do not come in handy, such as the opponents who throw the headlines.
During restructuring, restitution should not be left untouched.