The depression of Turkish-American relations is getting deeper every day. The most curious issue is how the crisis will follow and how it will result; because of the probable course and outcome of this crisis, the two countries not only size, surroundings or complacency Turkey's geography is of great importance in terms of weight all over the world.
As I stated in my previous article, Turkey "New Yalta Process" or "New World Order" of the name, shape having largely determine capacity. Therefore crisis between Turkey and the US, will build fifty or even a hundred years of war.
Here until the geopolitical and strategic importance owned by Turkey, the Turkish-Islamic impressive in the world / trigger role and operational as will be demonstrated performance in the field, that can not be ignored fighting force, as a reality that should not be on the forefront.
The United States has tested this prospect in Iraq and Syria policies, more precisely in its occupation initiatives, outside Afghanistan. His conclusion is: an operation without Turkey/occupation attempt doomed to failure in the medium-long term! The US can occupy but its costs are very heavy; for example in Iraq. Recall that American officials as a major cause of the failure in Iraq and the increasing cost of Turkey between 2003-2008 had shown.
Or the US is trying to occupy it, but it infects the face; for example, as in Syria. From the date the US began to prefer the terrorist organization PYD-YPG/PKK as "black ally", the US started to lose in Syria. Moreover, Syria has laid the foundation for the birth of a regional pact. Since 2002, loudly voiced that "Turkey-Russia-Iran" trio appeared to be imagined.
In Afghanistan, after the occupation, the USA, which has been unable to take its nose out of the tops, has found a Turkish flag in its arms or vehicles, and has been especially at the point of fighting as a combat power on its own behalf in Ankara from 2010 onwards.
The current main agenda of the US is Iran. The path to the success of the operations in Iran goes through Turkey. And it's a way for Turkey to be convinced. But Turkey; Since he is aware of the fact that the post-Iranian period is self, he rejects any "dirty convincing proposals" and therefore faces a "hostile action"; As stated in the ANKASAM Report ...
ANKASAM Report ...
Crisis between Turkey and the United States so far not been discussed much in the international legal dimension. However, it is of utmost importance that the United States, which has been trying to impose its will on the whole world through its national laws, has examined the sanctions policies of the United States for many years and the answers given by the countries concerned in terms of international law. Because such a review will set the legal status of the "rogue state" for the United States.
In this context, received the founder president penned by I made Ankara Crisis and Political Studies SOB who Olimj of the Center experts and published in www.ankasam.org site a few days ago "Evaluation of the International Law Context of US Sanctions Against Turkey" report to the some of the findings to the fore here I want to mention.
Another issue here is that I want to draw your attention: a report explaining the decision said the US sanctions against Turkey, "the Russian model," stated what the applicant. The ANKASAM Report also discusses this model and how it responds to the US and other countries exposed to Russia and US sanctions.
In particular, some of the findings can be listed as follows:
• US efforts to provide cross-border quality to their domestic law have been an ongoing process for years in international relations. According to this, the will of the state is applied to the whole world society with unilateral national laws. In other words, the imperialist mentality of the US stands with the help of national laws.
• The decision by the US sanctions taken against Turkey, "the maintenance of international peace and security or the re-establishment" is not in line with the UN Security Council decision was taken because of political objectives unilaterally. Moreover, this decision also means to intervene in the judgment of a sovereign state.
• The priest Brunson is a clear indication of the intervention of a state by a state other than the violation of human rights, which the US put forward as an argument for sanctions.
• US sanctions are gaining weight by holding the view that only two limited macro-projects will also affect Turkey's 2023 target for a number of applications that it will engage in rhetoric. From this point of view, it seems that the crisis is not just of Priest Brunson. In fact, the US administration both on a regional position and influence in the global system will change in a positive sense be considered as aimed at blocking Turkey's macro strategy.
• No. 13818 US presidential crisis is not a sanction on the basis of the decision taken on the basis of the Decree, a phase of the crisis between the two countries in recent years and can be expressed as a sub crisis in the global financial crisis.
• Implementation of the Global Magnitsky Act forms the legal basis of the sanctions against Turkey for the first time in NATO ally Turkey citizen outside the Russian citizens constitute the starting point of this study.
• Trump, Ankara "to make concessions" or "apply pressure" forced to make a choice between that and has chosen the second way it seems.
• Initially more crisis regarded as cyclical as the fact that the structural nature and will lead to radical changes in together in terms of trending parties in this context, from which is very different than the old no more than a clear winning case.
• Although the US sanctions pressure Turkey diplomatic process, contrary to popular belief you targeted to economically isolate also may isolate Washington.
• The US sanctions resolution will be described as "hostile action" and public opinion formation in this context will be an effective and effective step.
• Analyzing process in Turkey-US relations, the list of sanctions to be taken to the relevant ministers, the United States clearly can be interpreted as passing attack. In this context, it is possible to foresee that the bilateral relations will worsen. Indeed, statements from the US gives signs that further extend the sanctions to be applied against Turkey.
• US ally Turkey is an allegation that developed a new direction by pushing the outside of the projection system is also necessary to discuss. Because Turkey to stay out of NATO, Turkey is a NATO member against the event will pave the way states or NATO intervention. Otherwise, ie, if the continuation of Turkey's accession to NATO, this possibility will not be possible in terms of both international law policy. At the very least, the US will not want to become a country that occupies its allies.
• In this context, Turkey-based political-economic cooperation against the United States, Germany-axis reinforced "EU / New West"; the "Eurasian Union", based on political and security, with a stronger Russia-Iran axis; China axis, economic and political weight "Belt-road" geography reinforced base area "World-Island Cooperation" policy development road can go to.