There are dozens of reasons for the boredom, but only one is enough: the US President Donald Trump. Therefore, the NATO Summit; Before the start between the US and the "Others", the crisis has begun to become a scene.
It is expected that President Trump will put the similarities of NATO Bills he had imposed during his visit to Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel to Washington in front of some of the other alliance members. As a matter of fact, when we look at the main points of the summit, especially the message shared by Trump's social media account before the summit, this can be clearly seen.
The Brussels Summit takes place under six main headings: "Strengthening Deterrence and Defense", "Combating Terrorism and Stabilization", "Strengthening Business Union with the European Union", "Modernizing NATO", "More Equitable Sharing" Common Values and the Transatlantic Union".
In fact, two main agenda items can be mentioned here: the first is the future of US-EU relations, and this is a reflection on NATO. The second is "responsibility sharing". The summit, the first issue, is under the title "Strengthening the Business Association with the EU". This title is officially equivalent to the announcement of the breakdown between the US and the EU. The second issue is the message of "pamuk eller copebe" to EU member states, especially Germany under the name of "More Responsible Sharing".
The USA is in the pursuit of "New Goose" ...
As a matter of fact, Trump is sending a letter to nine NATO members before the Summit to increase their defense spending, and the social media account says: "The US is contributing much more to NATO than all its allies. This is unfair and unacceptable."
EU and member states of the EU are forced to pay money to the United States in exchange for the security of their security like the Gulf States. Trump is promoting the Russian threat through the Crimea and the East Ukraine, and it keeps this on the agenda in the fact that this subtle account lies. Russian threat in Europe, Iran in the Gulf; you are ...
The treatment taken here for the EU member states is in fact equivalent to the withdrawal to the Gulf States. The EU is now in the stage of the US "Second Gulf", now a new excavation to be called.
In the meantime, the phrase "prisoner" Trump uses for Germany is not so wrong. But there is a need for a little fix. What needs to be corrected is that Germany is not Russia, but the United States.
Is Trump aware of this, does not he know that? Of course he does. Trump, in fact, is saying that they are aware that Germany is trying to follow a policy of being more independent with the support of Russia, but they will not allow it. So Trump, also a second Turkey-Russia relations condone the process here whether they are expressed in an indirect way.
What happens if these nine members, especially Germany, refuse to pay more? This is not too difficult to answer. First of all, Russian tanks are opened and then they become new addresses of "international terrorist organizations" that Europe is supporting in a certain way. Do they try? Or look at the examples that are available ...
Another Name for the Process of Distressed Divorce from the EU: Brexit
He thought it would be very easy when the British people showed a will to leave the EU. But the developments in life are about to eat another one (Theresa May) as a prime minister (David Cameron) has eaten his head.
As a matter of fact, "Brexit resignations" continue in England. The political crisis can deepen further. Well, why should the British people (and the government) first say why we should leave, and now they say that we should not leave or at least be a soft departure process? Actually, it's not that hard to answer. To explain briefly ...
The first issue, of course, is based on economic reasons. In a more concrete way, the 2008 crisis and its reflections to England have an important place in Brexit. With this crisis, the British people in fact saw that the EU was not an economic power as exaggerated. However, the EU was being laid as an economic giant to the whole world. It is clear that not the giant EU, Germany ... So Britain worries that this crisis may have some negative reflections to it.
The second issue is; it was the return to the fast nation-state process that affected the whole world and had an impact on the EU as well. Rapid xenophobia, racism and the rapid escalation of Islamophobia in Europe, the collapse of the "EU Neighborhood Policy" along with the refugee floods, and the emerging security problems in Europe seem to have driven Britain to this position. Britain seems to have terminated its membership in order not to be caught unprepared for the new process, foreseeing that the EU could not continue in this context any longer.
The third issue is; He saw that the EU was actually part of Germany's policy toward the West and that Britain was used here too. Britain seems to have sought a deeper co-operation with the rest of Europe by increasing the Eastern European weight of Germany's opposition within the EU, furthering the EU's disintegration process.
The fourth issue is; Britain wanted to take part here as part of a multi-polar world in the new international system, along with the weakening power of the United States. In other words, the UK's account, acting more independently of the EU and the US, was a pole in the New Yalta process, based on the Commonwealth it had.
So why is England now curling?
I say. First, he realized he was not an economically powerful force. Moreover he saw the bill of separation from the EU. In the meantime, we should not forget the Trump factor. The United Kingdom felt that the losing US could harm itself as well. So the UK understands that it is too late to take a timeless step and now follows a policy to save time.
So what is the attitude of Brussels, or rather of Berlin, in the face of all these developments? Let us also say: to keep the UK under the control of the EU umbrella, at any cost, and to prevent it from developing common policies with the United States. So this Brexit process takes more water ...