Since 1896, according to the will of Alfred Nobel, people who have achieved success in physics, chemistry, literature, medicine have been selected and they are awarded by the Nobel committee. However, it is not known what is targeted behind the scenes, and how is the determination of the person to be awarded. What is interesting is that the awards are given to those who have smeared the bread of the global capitalist system or who would somehow want to use it. Although there are those who know and reject the intentions of the award-makers in the background, many believe that it is a privilege to receive the award.
Unfortunate statements of a fascist writer who was awarded the Nobel Prize were recently on the agenda. As you recall, dozens of people were trapped in Srebrenica, and women were left widows and children were left orphans. The Austrian fascist writer Pete Handke, who denied the genocide in Srebrenica, argued that Muslim Bosniaks killed themselves and blame the Serbs. I had a hard time understanding why our people who witnessed these remarks were unworthy of Handke's Nobel Prize. In Palestine, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, dozens of people who slaughtered, strangling children, women raped and smelling milk in the mouth of babies who put bully mentality and who represent them who would reward reward? Were the representatives of the capitalist mentality to reward the men of justice and justice? Would the contractor, who served humanity with a breakthrough in technology with his art and scientific studies, reward the jihadists? Would it reward the kind-hearted people who feed the poor and stretch the wings of the orphans? No, no, the representatives of the capitalist system cannot, cannot afford to do so. They only reward their supporters or candidates.
While people were discussing a fascist writer's coming up with the Nobel Prize, I thought of those who, like Sartre, like Sartre, who realized and rejected the prize. They knew it was a political trap, so they refused without hesitation.
As you will recall, Russian author Pasternak wrote in 1958 that he intended to confuse Russia in the background of the prize he was given: I specify. Sartre, who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1964, refused. Sartre opposed the French war of exploitation against Algeria and criticized this period. He explained the reason for rejecting the award to a newspaper: I think the author who adopts an attitude in political or literary matters should only use his own means, his pen and paper.
The award can be seen as a great opportunity for those who have achieved success in various fields but have not been able to establish their cultural identity and have not been able to designate a direction for themselves. However, we know that they do not reward in any way those who take their stand for rights and justice. Obviously, these people do not need the reward of these insolvents.