İsmail Kıllıoğlu: "Fatal governments"

İsmail Kıllıoğlu: "Fatal governments"
Date: 8.5.2019 17:00

Milli Gazete columnist İsmail Kıllıoğlu writes about Turkey's political period. Here is the full article.

email Print zoom+ zoom-
The main problem of the Middle East Muslim people has been the management and especially the governments for years. Instead of addressing the question of governments in the context of the principles of belief they have, they sought in the traditional structures and practices before the rejection of the principles of believe. In this way, they have condemned themselves as an authoritarian or totalitarian, non-accountable, irresponsible power and management approach based on inequality, descent and clan privilige. In this understanding, it was hoped that the monopolization of power would be inevitable and this would be inevitably destroy the basic human rights and freedoms and that the persecution would become normal and prevented the union.  For this, even a number of deficiencies, inaccurasies, heresy, illegitimacy were disapproved  it was wanted to be approved with the qualifications such as the lesser evil. For example, instead of responding to the option that appeared in the style of obedience, resistance, or style, the discussions on completely different contexts such as stratification were discussed. But finally, the sedition which they wanted to avoid, which they were trying to avoid with care, emerged with heavier and wider dimensions.
 
On the other hand, the Muslim people of the Middle East resorted to perceiving their problems in an imaginative way, instead of addressing their problems in their own means and power. They attempted to identify what should be conceived as reality and what should be conceived as idea. They did not realize that they lived in a world of timeless and spatial reality without taking into account the determinative nature of time and space. Moreover, they were caught in a timeless and space-free world. They saw this questioning as a way out of their beliefs and values.
However the principles of beliefs one proposes to question and load one as a requirement of one’s responsibility to the question. For example, why does the power belong to the person or family or group or the dynasty? Why should it be obeyed to the power or rulet hat has become a source of corruption, tugyan and oppression? Is the possibility of human rights and freedoms to be realized under the control of power less or more? In an environment where rights and freedoms are experienced more, does not thougt, science, art and trade provide more benefits to people and society? 
 
By hook or by crook, the Arab Spring was a genuine reaction to the economic, social, and political conditions in which the Muslim people lived and could provide a search for an interrogation. It can still be thought that this is within the limits of the possibility. It is fort his reason that the miserable governments, who have kept the Muslims under their pressures, are in search of ways to eliminate this possibility. These administrations see their existence as the collaborators of these forces only if they are provided with the support of the imperialist powers. Fort his purpose, people’s needs and wishes to live in friendship and peace are kept in an environment of war and dangers to be drowned by bloodshed by the power producing group. Would it be possible, for instance, that the social tragedies that came today would be so cruel if it had only been called “no” in the name of the peace of peoples against the occupation of Iraq and the plans to overthrow Syria?
 
The problem is that these zealous administrations do not give any value to the people that you leave, in general they have the least respect for human beings, at least they manage as an object of their power and debauchery. Even the most primitive, most ignorant, most senseless being, protects, observes an existence which one submits to oneself that one needs to live. One feels compelled to do this even with one’s own, selfish pretense. What they see in the public is a poor, miserable, ignorant, unsafe life and a dishonorable, dishonest, unsuitable and distrespectful personality. They reflect what they see for public with pageantry, waste, oppression, humiliating life and personalities but they do not understand that this is a reflection of their own human being and personality. They’re covering their misery with impudence and corruption.

YEREL HABERLER

Milli Gazete Puplication Group All Rights Reserved © 2000-2016 - Can not be published without permission ! Tel : +90 212 697 1000  /  Fax : +90 212 697 1000 Software Development and System Support: Milli Gazete