History will describe the years in which these powers are at work as a period of government that can defend the contradictory issues and the titles with the same self-confidence.
A ruling that keeps the early electoral demands equivalent to "treason" is now able to explain with pleasure what the "dominant election" is needed today. It has become almost routine to act with an understanding that can not come to the middle, reasonable way that always lives in the tip. They try to take advantage of as much as possible because of the "human minds are able to forget." But our country has come to such a point that it is not as easy as it was yesterday. People have especially begun to remember today that they wanted to forget in the past. In contrast to yesterday, there is a deep expectation. The quest is in vogue. Stuff is accumulating. Sometimes there is despair, sometimes anger. People are heading towards a breaking point at the fastest pace since we will be worse off than we are.
Was this decision taken because dosing of the questionnaires would increase more and more in the future?
I was in Sivas on Thursdays and Fridays. I found the opportunity to visit 8 counties. I had a lot of public conversation. I tried to understand people exactly. I made dinners. I talked to the farmers, to the beef, to the artisan. I say independently of political considerations. People's discomfort began to hit their tongues.
You hear a thousand 'ouch' from the people you touch(meet).
For example, a butcher in the town of Hafik "I bought this shop for 110 peasants 10 years ago. Now I can not transfer it to 10 peasants. You understand what I lost when you also account for the fall in the value of money. The authorities are moving away from us without hearing our complaints when they arrive. " In Hafik again, a construction worker approaching the limbs in his hands; "My son is a machine technician. The school ended with a good degree. I'm working on construction because I can not find a job," he said and began to cry.
In fact, it was obvious that the early election was inevitable. The expected step was that these elections could be held in October-November. But the economy and the problems we had in the first place became such that an early election was decided. In fact, it must be understood that the government has "ruled" the country and sees the dominant choice as an outlet.
Another dimension of this decision is the MHP's role in this process. If we think that the MHP is the determining factor in the election decision of 3 November 2002, we can say that the AKP has an indirect or significant contribution to the coming of the MHP. It is also noteworthy that this election decision was made by the MHP, which first dated August 26, and then on 24 June. In other words, it is the question that the power which is a very important contributor in the coming of the MHP will be the cause of the departure from the work together with this election, now everyone is waiting for the answer with curiosity.
We will see the result of election on how Turkey's real agenda and government's agenda stay in difference on 24 June elections.