The agreement made with the United States, which would allow the withdrawal of terrorists from Manbij, was awarded as diplomatic victory in some newspapers. However, there is no news of the terrorists being pulled from Manbij in spite of the time spent there. The news that our troops have been circulating in certain periods is photographed in the media. On the contrary, the news of the withdrawal of the terrorists from Münbic is frequently in the media. I would like to give two examples of these reports. The first is in the media, "Turkey should save us" took place under the title. The story was as follows:
"Despite the agreement between Turkey and the United States were to withdraw PKK from the occupied manbij. Manbij people wants Turkey's intervention to clear the city of terrorists."
Similar news came out before. Even in one writing, the terrorists will withdraw from Manbij and go where they will go, protecting their assets as they will not evaporate. I have expressed my belief that they will either hide their weapons in certain places they know, or sell them under their hands and mingle with civilian people. Yesterday, a journalist said in a statement under the title "They are selling US weapons": "YPG would deliver weapons while withdrawing from Manbij. Some militants began selling their weapons to different groups."
I think it will once again be seen that the words given by the United States against these writings can not be trusted. In fact, since the beginning of events in Syria, the US and some NATO member coalition partners have always stood by terrorist organizations. By arming and training the terrorists, they gave the right to refuge when they came in, and they wielded arm wing. The Crusader Alliance has consistently shown a common movement on this issue.
When we look at the protection of the US against FETO, it is not necessary to say that it is only deceiving ourselves that this country is regarded as friendly and allied. Despite Turkey's head and militants of the terrorist organization continues to demand caution and all life in the United States. Despite sacks document sent on Turkey's request to extradite the terrorists can not be positive answer. To sum up, "America continues to protect and protect terrorists. It is almost as if birds are not flying because of the security measures taken at the entrance of the camp in the county of Saylorsburg, Pennsylvania, where the ringleader of FETÖ lived."
Protecting the members of the terrorist organization is not only the United States of America is not the NATO member Greece, Germany and France are also acting together when we recall that Trump's last NATO summit can be withdrawn from the organization can not make too much sense to take the word. In other words, NATO, which is not actually the cause of its existence, needs to be disbanded in the future, and it is only because NATO is forced to increase its contributions to countries outside the United States. Trump finally showed the comfort of taking what he wanted to do in the end.
In short, the Crusaders should not believe in their estrangements between them, as if they were broken. In the meantime, as a single Muslim country, NATO member should share our contribution to NATO expenditures with our nationality. Just as NATO is in Afghanistan, it can be used at another time in another Muslim country.