Something happened to our AKP-affiliated friends recently! They got very touchy! They do not tolerate the slightest criticism! Whenever something been written against them on social media, they take their breath in the courts immediately!
And they impose an access barrier to that news.
In doing so, they rely on the claim that the articles are violating personal rights.
For example, some claim that those who eat dry bread are not considered hungry and should be considered full.
This claim is naturally met with reaction.
And the investigation begins about the owner of the word.
Studies show that this person paid the municipality for the kebabs he ate.
Those who learn this are reporting the event.
But the person concerned immediately applies to the court and gets an access ban decision.
Access to this news is blocked, saying that the news is violating personal rights.
Practices show that everything in favor of the members of the government can be written, but it is not welcomed to talk about any developments that are against them.
In fact, the same rule can be regarded not only for members of power but also for the partners of the People's Alliance.
In this case, we say "if the matter is resolved without delay and this work is determined by law".
If things that would be to the detriment of the members of the government or the members of the People's Alliance were banned, only the things that would be in their favor were allowed to be written, people would not stop tiring to get access denial decisions at court gates.
Something similar is happening in the news about the Ministry of Agriculture.
Even the news with Presidential Communication Center (CIMER) certificate, that is, open evidence, gets stuck in the decisions of the access ban.
So, can decisions to block access be made and what is going on remain confidential?
It spreads in such a way that everything, faster than the speed of light, reaches everywhere instantly.
In other words, the members of the government cannot hide the issues they cause from the citizens by making decisions to block access.